Coleman

Coleman v. Baumgartner

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20233:23-cv-01737California471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WENDELL COLEMAN, Case No. 23-cv-01737-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

KENDRA BAUMGARTNER, et al., JURISDICTION Defendants.

12 Pro se plaintiff Wendell Coleman commenced this action on April 11, 2023. ECF 1. He asserts claims for violations of 10 U.S.C. § 921, 18 U.S.C. § 35, § 241, § 242, § 1001, § 1621, and 25 C.F.R. § 11.404, in connection with child custody, domestic violence, and other familial disputes. Id. at 2. There are two bases for subject matter jurisdiction in federal court: federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction. Federal question jurisdiction requires that the claims asserted in a complaint arise under federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Diversity jurisdiction requires that (1) the amount in controversy exceed $75,000 and (2) the parties be citizens of different states. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Courts have “an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.