Jaiyeola

Jaiyeola v. Apple, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20235:23-cv-03462California1,529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Case No. 5:23-cv-03462-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

SECOND EX PARTE MOTION FOR

v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

APPLE, INC, Re: ECF Nos. 6, 18, 22 Defendant.

On July 26, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff Ganiyu Jaiyeola’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”), enjoining Apple from harassing or terminating him. ECF No. 12 (“7/26/23 Order”). In doing so, the Court found that Plaintiff had failed to show likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm. Id. The Court also converted the TRO application into a motion for preliminary injunction and scheduled a hearing for August 24, 2023. Id. Plaintiff now brings a renewed ex parte TRO application because he received notice on August 8, 2023, that his employment was being terminated. ECF No. 18 (“TRO Appl.”). Plaintiff seeks an order “immediately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.