Akers

Akers v. Labson-Freeman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20233:23-cv-04221California1,297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS, Case No. 23-cv-04221-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

v. TO AMEND

BETH LABSON-FREEMAN, et al., Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a federal prisoner who is proceeding without representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights complaint against two judges of this court, Judge Beth Labson-Freeman and Judge Edward Chen, and a prosecutor employed by the United States Department of Justice, Katherine Siereveld. He claims they violated his Eighth Amendment rights by conspiring to subject him to torturous conditions in federal prison. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a separate order. For the reasons explained below, the complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.