John Doe I v. Cerebral, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20234:23-cv-02239California2,718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE I, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02239-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND AND DENYING REQUEST

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

CEREBRAL, INC., Re: ECF No. 10 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand and request for attorney’s fees. ECF No. 10. The Court will grant the motion and deny the request for fees. I. BACKGROUND In this putative class action, Plaintiffs John Doe I and John Doe II allege that Defendant Cerebral, Inc., a telehealth company, disclosed their personal medical information to Meta Platforms, Inc. without their knowledge. ECF No. 1-1 ¶ 2, 5. Plaintiffs filed suit against Cerebral in San Francisco Superior Court on April 3, 2023, bringing claims under the unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent prongs of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. Cerebral removed this case to this Court under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) on May 8, 2023. ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.