Burgos

Burgos v. Citibank, N.A

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20233:23-cv-01907California3,062 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SUSANA BURGOS, Case No. 23-cv-01907-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

CITIBANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Susana Burgos’s motion to remand this putative class case to state court. The matter is fully briefed1 and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for September 14, 2023 is VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers, carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court DENIES the motion for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Burgos brings claims for violations of state wage and hour laws, stemming from Citibank’s alleged failure to pay correct minimum wage, overtime, and sick pay when due, provide meal and rest breaks, record missed meal and rest breaks, reimburse employees for required expenses,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.