Crittendon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AJEENAH CRITTENDON, et al., Case No. 22-cv-09153-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING MOTION FOR

ANGELICA MULDROW, ATTORNEY FEES, AND DENYING

MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant.

15 I. INTRODUCTION The parties here have filed three motions. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that this action is barred by res judicata. Prior to this, Plaintiffs filed a motion for attorney fees relating to Defendant’s previously filed (and denied) anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs argue that motion was frivolous, and that they should be awarded fees as a result. Finally, Defendant has filed a motion to strike portions of Plaintiffs’ reply brief in connection with the motion for attorney fees. All of these motions are suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the…