Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Kendo Holdings Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20233:22-cv-08958California1,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 AMARTE USA HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 22-cv-08958-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

v.

LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT

KENDO HOLDINGS INC., et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. (“Amarte”) brings this action for trademark infringement against Kendo Holdings, Inc., Marc Jacobs International LLC, Sephora USA, Inc., and The Neiman Marcus Group LLC (together, “Original Defendants”), for selling the Marc Jacobs “EYE-CONIC” eyeshadow palette, allegedly infringing on Amarte’s “EYECONIC” trademark for its eye cream. See Compl. (dkt. 1). Amarte moves to amend its complaint twice: First to add seven “interested corporate parent parties,” (together, “Parent Defendants”) and next to add ten “retailers of goods bearing the infringing EYE- CONIC trademark” (together, “Retailer Defendants”). First Mot. (dkt. 52) at 1; Second Mot. (dkt. 66) at 3.1 27 Finding this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.