Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20235:22-cv-04224California3,433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S Plaintiff, SECOND MOTION RE CONTEMPT;

v. ORDER RE JULY 29, 2023

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 73 Defendants.

14 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ahmad Mukhtar Faizi filed a “Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief,” on behalf of nominal defendant Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame”), against two of Falafel Flame’s directors, Baktash Temori and Masoud Rustakhis, as well as a number of entities, including allegedly unauthorized Falafel Flame eateries. Mr. Faizi asserts 22 claims for relief, including direct and derivative claims for relief. Relevant to the present motion for an order of contempt, Mr. Faizi asserted derivative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.