Moore
Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VICTORIA MOORE, Case No. 22-cv-07310-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. AMEND AND GRANTING MOTION
TO DISMISS IN PART
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 35 Defendant.
12 Before the Court are Plaintiff Victoria Moore’s motion to file a Third Amended Complaint and Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for lack of standing. For the reasons set forth below, Moore’s motion to amend is GRANTED, and Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This action arises from Wells Fargo’s alleged unlawful conduct concerning Moore’s request for loan assistance after she defaulted on the loan of her home located at 461 Starmont Court, Danville, CA 94529 (the “Property”). Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), ECF 23 ¶ 2. Moore inherited the Property from the trust of her late husband in 2016. Id. at ¶ 1. In 2020, Moore…