Patel

Patel v. Alphabet Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20235:23-cv-03647California556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RAJ PATEL, Case No. 23-cv-03647-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE

v. UNDER SEAL

ALPHABET INC., et al., Defendants.

12 On August 8, 2023, this Court dismissed Plaintiff Raj Patel’s Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend and directed Plaintiff to file his Third Amended Complaint within 30 days of that order. On August 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to file under seal his Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 21-3, and to seal his original complaint, ECF No. 1, First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 13, Motion to Reconsider, ECF No. 15, and his Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 18. “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.