Floyd

Floyd v. Santa Clara County District Attorney

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20235:23-cv-02754California2,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 23-cv-02754-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS

v. AND TERMINATING MOTIONS FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT SUMMARY JUDGMENT ATTORNEY, et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 12, 13, and 32] Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd accuses the Santa Clara County District Attorney and three Deputy District Attorneys of violating his civil rights as part of an ongoing criminal prosecution. Mr. Floyd asks for damages and injunctive relief. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Mr. Floyd’s claims. ECF No. 32 (“Mot.”); ECF No. 38 (“Reply”). Mr. Floyd opposes the motion. ECF No. 37 (“Opp.”). Mr. Floyd has also moved for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 12) and summary judgment (ECF No. 13). For the reasons discussed below, the proceedings are STAYED, Mr. Floyd’s motion for preliminary injunction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.