Edmonds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 MARK EDMONDS, Case No. 23-cv-02741-AGT Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS

D21Q INC., Defendant. Because Mark Edmonds 1s proceeding in forma pauperis, he may rely on the United States || Marshals Service (USMS) “to serve the summons and the complaint.” Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-— |} 84 (1995). To that end, Edmunds is responsible for providing the Court with “sufficient information to serve [the defendant].” Jd. On July 6, 2023, the USMS attempted to serve defendant D21Q, Inc. at the address |} Edmonds provided (548 Market Street, PMB 14763, San Francisco, CA 94104), but according to a || the service-of-process receipt filed on the docket, ““D2iQ is not at [the] address provided.” Dkt. 8. || Edmonds subsequently filed a one-page “request to serve the defendant’s attorney” which lists, Z …