Huaman

Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Huaman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20235:22-cv-05796California923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, Case No. 22-cv-05796-BLF

INC.,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER STAYING CASE 9 v.

ZENON HUAMAN,

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Innovative Sports Management, Inc.’s response, ECF No. 37, to the Court’s order to show cause, ECF No. 36, which requests that the Court not vacate its Order Granting in Part Motion for Default Judgment, see ECF No. 30, and the Judgment, see ECF No. 31, and that the Court stay the case for thirty days. For the reasons described below the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request. I. BACKGROUND On August 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of order and order to show cause, which informed the Court of an order against Plaintiff in Innovative Sports Mgmt., Inc. v. Portocarrero, No. CV 19-08726 (C.D. Cal.), which vacated a default judgment in Plaintiff’s favor because Plaintiff’s New Jersey certificate of incorporation was revoked in 2015. ECF No. 35 at 3. The Portocarrero order states…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.