Morilha

Morilha v. Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20234:22-cv-03565California662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL VITOR MORILHA, Case No. 22-cv-03565-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET

v. ASIDE JUDGMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Re: ECF No.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

11 Defendant.

12 On June 16, 2022, Plaintiff Daniel V. Morilha filed his complaint in this action against Defendant Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara (“Superior Court”). ECF No. 1. He filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) on August 29, 2022. ECF No. 17. Defendant subsequently filed a motion to dismiss, which this Court granted on May 1, 2023. ECF Nos. 22, 50. In so ruling, the Court held that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, and that Plaintiff failed to allege that he complied with the State of California’s claim presentation requirement. ECF No. 50. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion seeking to set aside judgment. ECF No. 52. The Court took the motion under submission without a hearing on August 11,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.