Just Goods, Inc. v. Just, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20233:18-cv-02198California4,570 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUST GOODS, INC., Case No. 18-cv-02198-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO STAY THE COURT’S

ORDER PENDING APPEAL

JUST, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 203 Defendants.

12 This motion arises from yet another dispute between plaintiff Just Goods Inc. (“JGI”) and defendants Eat Just, Inc. and its founder Joshua Tetrick (collectively, “EJ”). The parties executed a binding Term Sheet to settle their trademark lawsuit four years ago. Since then, they have returned to me three times to adjudicate disputes relating to their interpretation of the Term Sheet that they wrote. On March 30, 2020, I entered an order to enforce the settlement agreement after finding that EJ had failed to comply with the Term Sheet. March 30 Order [Dkt. No. 142]. On September 11, 2020, I held EJ in contempt of court for its continued failure to comply with the terms of the Term Sheet. September 11 Order [Dkt. No. 170]. EJ appealed, and the Ninth Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.