Quinonez
Quinonez v. Does 1 through 5
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 RENE QUINONEZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03195-WHO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO MAKE ADDITIONAL
AMENDMENTS TO THIRD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.
11 Plaintiffs René Quiñonez and Movement Ink LLC (“the plaintiffs”) seek leave to make further amendments to their Third Amendment Complaint (“TAC”) to add claims under California’s Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (“Bane Act”) for alleged First and Fourth Amendment violations. Mot. [Dkt. No. 84] 2:11-20. The United States of America opposes the request, arguing that the proposed amendments: (1) go beyond the limited leave to amend I gave the plaintiffs when granting in part and denying in part the most recent motions to dismiss; and (2) would be futile. Oppo. [Dkt. No. 88] 1:20-2:9. The proposed amendments would be futile and the motion is DENIED.1 The parties are familiar with the allegations and…