Jackson v. Red Rock Credit Solutions, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20233:22-cv-04471California1,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLY T. JACKSON, Case No. 22-cv-04471-AGT

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT

v. JUDGMENT

RED ROCK CREDIT SOLUTIONS, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant.

12 Kelly T. Jackson has moved for default judgment against Red Rock Credit Solutions, LLC. Her motion is denied without prejudice to filing a renewed motion that addresses the following issues: 1. Personal Jurisdiction Before entering default judgment, the district court must confirm that it has personal and subject-matter jurisdiction. See In re Tuli, 172 F.3d 707, 712 (9th Cir. 1999). “A judgment entered without personal jurisdiction over the parties is void.” Id. “It is the plaintiff’s burden to establish jurisdiction.” Ziegler v. Indian River Cnty., 64 F.3d 470, 473 (9th Cir. 1995). Jackson has not established that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Red Rock. According to the complaint, Red Rock is a Nevada LLC with its principal place of business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.