Richter

Richter v. Oracle America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20235:22-cv-04795California909 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 HAONING RICHTER, Case No. 22-cv-04795-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., [Re: ECF No. 69] Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Haoning Richter’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal two declarations in support of her Opposition to Defendant Oracle America, Inc.’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. ECF No. 69. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED as it pertains to the paragraphs of the declarations identified below. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Consequently, filings that are “more than tangentially related…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.