Chung

Chung v. Eargo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20233:21-cv-08597California1,695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 21-cv-8597-CRB

IN RE EARGO, INC. SECURITIES

LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS THE AMENDED

This document relates to all consolidated COMPLAINT cases. Re: Dkt. 111

13 Earlier this year, the Court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ securities case because the consolidated complaint failed to plead with particularity certain facts establishing contemporaneous false statements or scienter. See In re Eargo, Inc. Sec. Litig., 2023 WL 1997918 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2023) (dkt. 103). In this case, the Plaintiffs allege that Eargo, Inc., an online direct-to-consumer hearing aid company, its corporate executives, directors, and IPO underwriters falsely or misleadingly inflated Eargo’s revenue and growth opportunities because the company’s business model was incompatible with the requirements for federal insurance reimbursement. The Plaintiffs also claim that Eargo falsely or misleadingly downplayed an insurance audit,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.