Kinnard
Kinnard v. Navarro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENNETH KINNARD, Case No. 22-cv-02534-JSW Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
? . Re: Dkt. No. 39, 40, 41 STEVE NAVARRO, et al., Defendants. L Now before the Court for consideration are Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion filed on June 30, || 2023, and Rule 19 motion for joinder filed on July 10, 2023. Plaintiffs motions were filed after || the notice of appeal was filed, and this Court thus lacks jurisdiction to entertain Plaintiffs a motions. Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 586 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Estrada v. Clines,
559 F. App’x 652, 652-53 (9th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions are DENIED for lack || of jurisdiction. Defendant’s motion to appoint counsel is DENIED without prejudice. IT ISSO ORDERED. || Dated: August 31, 2023 / / ahtege ee