Rothschild
Rothschild v. Gildred
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS E ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-01713-LJC
Mr. Rothschild,
ORDER SCREENING SECOND
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2);
STEPHANIE ANN GILDRED, et al., CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendants. 11 Re: ECF No.
12 Plaintiff Thomas E. Rothschild is proceeding in this case in forma pauperis (IFP). ECF No. 10. The Court previously screened his original Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (First Screening Order) and ordered Mr. Rothschild to file an amended complaint that addressed certain deficiencies identified by the Court as to the basis for its subject matter jurisdiction. Id. at 1. Mr. Rothschild filed his Second Amended Complaint (SAC) on July 27, 2023. ECF No. 22. But the Court nevertheless remains under a continuing duty to dismiss a case filed without the payment of the filing fee whenever it determines that “(A) the allegation of poverty is untrue; or (B) the action or appeal (i) is…