Terrell

Terrell v. City of Petaluma

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20233:22-cv-05411California3,679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRUCE TERRELL, Case No. 22-cv-05411-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

CITY OF PETALUMA, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The motion is fully briefed and suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing currently set for September 8, 2023. Having considered the parties’ papers, the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the motion IN PART and DENIES the motion IN PART WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual background1 Mr. Terrell was organizing the contents of his storage unit the night of September 2, 2021. ECF 1 at 10. At approximately 10:52 p.m., City of Petaluma Sergeant Rick Cox and Officers Adam Wirtz, Brandon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.