Katz-Lacabe

Katz-Lacabe v. Oracle America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20233:22-cv-04792California657 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL KATZ-LACABE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04792-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., UNDER SEAL

13 Defendant.

Plaintiffs filed an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and in response to this Court’s order on Plaintiffs’ previous motion to seal. See Dkt. 68 (“9/15 Order”). This new motion essentially re-raises Plaintiffs’ previously denied request to seal the vast majority of two exhibits—the Offline Access Request Response Reports (OARRRs) that Plaintiffs received from Defendant Oracle.1 For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied. Plaintiffs’ request for oral argument is also denied. Plaintiffs were requested “to propose a far more limited set of redactions” to the OARRRs. 9/15 Order. Despite this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.