Misch

Misch v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20234:22-cv-05278California5,489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID MISCH, Case No. 22-cv-05278-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING AMENDED

COMPLAINT; ADDRESSING

v. PENDING MOTIONS AND RECENT

FILINGS; INSTRUCTIONS TO

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S PLAINTIFF OFFICE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 14-16, 19, 20, 24, 28-31, 33 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Santa Rita County Jail, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 13) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This order also address Plaintiff’s pending motions and recent filings. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.