Davis

Davis v. County of Napa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20233:21-cv-04603California3,454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KATINA DAVIS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04603-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

COUNTY OF NAPA,

Re: Dkt. No. 78 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION This case was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) against the County of Napa by correctional officers who asserted claims for wages and overtime pay related to uncompensated pre-shift activities. Plaintiffs Katina Davis, Jae Steward, opt-in plaintiffs, and Defendant County of Napa (“the “County”) have entered into a settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) and now bring a Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (“Motion”). A hearing on the Motion was held on August 25, 2023. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background Plaintiffs are correctional officers employed by the County. They filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.