Kellman

Kellman v. Spokeo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20233:21-cv-08976California1,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AVIVA KELLMAN, et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-08976-WHO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILED SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

SPOKEO, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 114 Defendant.

12 In this putative class action, the plaintiffs assert that defendant Spokeo, Inc., violated various state laws by, among other things, publicizing the plaintiffs’ personal information on the defendant’s website. See First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) [Dkt. No. 112]. The plaintiffs previously amended their complaint, see id., and the briefing schedule for the motion for class certification has been extended several times, [Dkt. Nos. 78, 82, 84]. The plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification on May 3, 2023, [Dkt. No. 92], and Spokeo’s opposition is currently due on September 19, 2023, [Dkt. No. 109]. Now the plaintiffs have filed the present motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”). (“Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 114]. Spokeo opposed, (“Oppo.”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.