Constantin

Constantin v. Navarrete

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20235:22-cv-07075California5,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MITCHEL CONSTANTIN, Case No. 22-cv-07075-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS

JORGE E. NAVARRETE, Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendant.

13 Mitchel Constantin, who is representing himself, sues Jorge Navarrete, the Clerk and Executive Officer of the California Supreme Court, for alleged violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., and for alleged violations of his constitutional and statutory rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Compl. ¶¶ 11-12. Mr. Navarrete moves to dismiss all claims in the complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Dkt. No. 7. Mr. Constantin opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 10. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Dkt. No. 15. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, the Court grants Mr. Navarrete’s motion and dismisses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.