Ruf
Ruf v. Raging Waters San Jose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 BONNIE RUF, Case NO: 5:22-cv-07458 NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL y DISMISSAL Re: ECF 33 RAGING WATERS SAN JOSE, and others, Defendants.
The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that
& 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 17 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the
|| Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 75 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 75 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 || Dated: September 7, 2023 he —j7