Miguel

Miguel v. Salesforce.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20233:20-cv-01753California1,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GREGOR MIGUEL, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01753-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

v. AMENDED CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT

SALESFORCE.COM, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 101 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiffs Gregor Miguel and Amanda Bredlow’s “Motion,” filed May 30, 2023, “for Leave to File Amended Class Action Complaint.” Defendants Salesforce.com, Inc. (“Salesforce”), Board of Directors of Salesforce, Marc Benioff, the Investment Advisory Committee (“Committee”), Joseph Allanson, Stan Dunlap, and Joachim Wettermark have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are former Salesforce employees who participated in the Salesforce 401(k) Plan (“the Plan”). (See First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.