Mosher-Clark

Mosher-Clark v. Gravity Defyer Medical Technology Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20234:22-cv-05288California4,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CECELIA MOSHER-CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-05288-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS

GRAVITY DEFYER MEDICAL Re: Dkt. No.

TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

11 Defendant. 12 This putative class action lawsuit alleges that Defendant Gravity Defyer Medical Technology Corporation (“Defendant” or “Gravity Defyer”) deceives consumers into purchasing shoes that do not provide the advertised clinically proven pain relief. Dkt. No. 30 (“FAC”). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss, which is fully briefed. Dkt. Nos. 31 (“Mot.”), 32 (“Opp.”), 33 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument, see Civil 7-1(b), and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND The following allegations are drawn from the FAC. Defendant is a designer and manufacturer of shoes worn to relieve knee, ankle, foot, and back pain using…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.