Keene

Keene v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20234:22-cv-01587California1,527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 SELINA KEENE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01587-JSW (RMI) Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S

v. PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN AND CONSOLIDATED CASES1 FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 125 Defendants. 13 Now pending before the court in these consolidated and related cases is a dispute related to Defendant City and County’s (hereafter, “Defendant”) proposed discovery plan. Given that the Vaccine Cases have been consolidated up to and including the court’s ruling on summary judgment motions (including, of course, consolidation for the purposes of discovery) (see dkt. 90 at 3), Defendant submitted a discovery plan such as to coordinate the discovery process in a centralized fashion that would avoid duplicative discovery requests or disputes, wastage of judicial resources, and the unnecessary burdening of any party (see generally dkt. 125). The court then…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.