Villanueva

Villanueva v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20233:23-cv-03403California4,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CINDY VILLANUEVA, Case No. 23-cv-03403-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION

MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, Re: Dkt. No. 8 INC., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Cindy Villanueva brings a putative class action against Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Maxim Healthcare Services Holdings, Inc., and Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services Inc. (collectively “Maxim”). Maxim moves to compel arbitration according to the terms of an arbitration agreement Villanueva signed. Because the parties signed a valid arbitration agreement that covers Villanueva’s claims, the Court grants Maxim’s motion to compel arbitration. I. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Maxim proves healthcare staffing services to hospitals and healthcare facilities throughout California. (Dkt. No. 1-1 ¶ 2.) Villanueva alleges Maxim “engaged in a systematic pattern of wage and hour violations” under California Law, including, in part, failing to pay minimum and overtime…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.