Ha

Ha v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20235:22-cv-02665California5,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 A.H., Case No. 22-cv-02665-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND GRANTING

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 15 13 Plaintiff A.H.1 appeals from a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, et seq. A.H. contends the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred in four respects. First, he contends the ALJ improperly discounted the medical opinions of his treating physician, Dr. James Luu. Second, he contends the ALJ failed to provide sufficient reasons for discounting his subjective testimony. Third, he contends the ALJ failed to provide sufficient reasons for discounting the lay witness testimony of his friend. Fourth, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.