Harris

Harris v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20233:22-cv-00529California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL JAY HARRIS, Case No. 22-cv-00529-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

v. PARTE MOTION

MATTHEW ATCHLEY, et al., Docket No. 61 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiff Michael Harris asks the Court to enjoin his transfer from sensitive needs custody at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) to a merged yard at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”). The Court granted a temporary restraining order enjoining Mr. Harris’s transfer and held an initial hearing to determine whether a preliminary injunction (“PI”) should issue. The Court ordered Defendants to file a supplemental brief with statistics that would assist the Court’s decision, and scheduled a second PI hearing for Thursday, September 21, 2023. See Docket Nos. 51, 56. Defendants have filed their supplemental brief, which reveals that the HDSP merged yard has 846 inmates in total, 127 of whom have an “R” suffix. See Docket No. 59. In the last six months, there…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.