Aguila
Aguila v. Becton and Dickinson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RAMON AGUILA, Case No. 5:22-cv-06670-EJD
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION AND
v. DISMISS CLASS ACTION CLAIMS
BECTON AND DICKINSON, et al., RRee:: DDoocckkeett NNooss.. 1166,, 2277 Defendants.
Plaintiff, Ramon Aguila (“Aguila” or “Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, initiated this employment lawsuit against Defendants Becton Dickinson and Company (“Becton Dickinson”)1 and Apidel Technologies, LLC (“Apidel”) (collectively “Defendants”) seeking damages and restitution for Defendants’ alleged violations of California’s Labor Code and Business and Professions Code. Defendants filed a joint motion to compel arbitration and dismiss Aguila’s class action claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). Aguila filed an Opposition, and Defendants filed a Reply. Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court…