Aguila

Aguila v. Becton and Dickinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20235:22-cv-06670California3,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RAMON AGUILA, Case No. 5:22-cv-06670-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

v. DISMISS CLASS ACTION CLAIMS

BECTON AND DICKINSON, et al., RRee:: DDoocckkeett NNooss.. 1166,, 2277 Defendants.

Plaintiff, Ramon Aguila (“Aguila” or “Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, initiated this employment lawsuit against Defendants Becton Dickinson and Company (“Becton Dickinson”)1 and Apidel Technologies, LLC (“Apidel”) (collectively “Defendants”) seeking damages and restitution for Defendants’ alleged violations of California’s Labor Code and Business and Professions Code. Defendants filed a joint motion to compel arbitration and dismiss Aguila’s class action claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). Aguila filed an Opposition, and Defendants filed a Reply. Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.