Spectrum Scientifics, LLC v. Celestron Acquisition, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20235:20-cv-03642California6,994 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AURORA ASTRO PRODUCTS LLC, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-03642-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

CELESTRON ACQUISITION, LLC, et al., Re: ECF No. 174 Defendants.

Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“DPPs” or “Plaintiffs”) move for summary judgment against Defendant Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. (“Ningbo Sunny”). ECF No. 174. Having considered all the papers and pleadings on file, the Court had determined that the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Without reiterating the entirety of the parties’ lengthy legal history, the instant putative antitrust class action follows on the heels of Defendants’ six-week trial before the Undersigned in Optronic Techs. Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny et al., No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD (N.D. Cal.) (the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.