Brandon Gay v. Pacific Steel Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20234:20-cv-08442California6,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRANDON GAY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08442-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

PACIFIC STEEL GROUP, Re: Dkt. No. 67 Defendant. ISRAEL BERBER, Case No. 21-cv-03446-HSG Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 45 v.

PACIFIC STEEL GROUP, Defendant.

17 The Court directed the parties to engage in targeted discovery regarding whether Plaintiffs’ claims were subject to and preempted by collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) and, if any dispute remained after discovery, to file motions for summary judgment on this narrow issue. Now pending before the Court are Defendant’s motions for summary judgment. Brandon Gay v. Pacific Steel Group, 20-cv-08442-HSG (“Gay Case”), Dkt. No. 67 (“Gay MSJ”); Berber v. Pacific Steel Group, 21-cv-03446-HSG (“Berber Case”), Dkt. No. 45 (“Berber MSJ”). Both motions have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.