Brandon Gay v. Pacific Steel Group
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRANDON GAY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08442-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
PACIFIC STEEL GROUP, Re: Dkt. No. 67 Defendant. ISRAEL BERBER, Case No. 21-cv-03446-HSG Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 45 v.
PACIFIC STEEL GROUP, Defendant.
17 The Court directed the parties to engage in targeted discovery regarding whether Plaintiffs’ claims were subject to and preempted by collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) and, if any dispute remained after discovery, to file motions for summary judgment on this narrow issue. Now pending before the Court are Defendant’s motions for summary judgment. Brandon Gay v. Pacific Steel Group, 20-cv-08442-HSG (“Gay Case”), Dkt. No. 67 (“Gay MSJ”); Berber v. Pacific Steel Group, 21-cv-03446-HSG (“Berber Case”), Dkt. No. 45 (“Berber MSJ”). Both motions have been…