Good Samaritan Hospital L.P. v. MultiPlan, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20233:22-cv-02139California2,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, L.P., Case No. 22-cv-02139-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

MULTIPLAN, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 92 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. Accordingly, the hearing set for July 6, 2023, was vacated. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Good Samaritan Hospital, L.P. (“Good Samaritan”), is a 474-bed acute care hospital in San Jose, California, that operates a 24-hour emergency room and includes a state-of- the art NICU center for the care of infants. Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) ¶ 4. Good Samaritan is a citizen of Tennessee and Delaware. Defendant MultiPlan, Inc. (“MultiPlan”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.