Good Samaritan Hospital L.P. v. MultiPlan, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20233:22-cv-02139California805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL L.P., Case No. 22-cv-02139-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL

MULTIPLAN, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 100 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is now pending before the Court. ECF 92. Defendant Altimetrik Corp. (“Altimetrik”) filed a brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. ECF 95. In addition, Altimetrik moved to seal portions of its brief as well as certain agreements underlying Plaintiff’s claims. ECF 100. This Order resolves Altimetrik’s administrative motion to seal; Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is resolved in a separate order. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby rules as follows. Because “courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents,’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.