James

James v. Contra Costa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20233:22-cv-05939California1,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARRIE JAMES, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05939-SI

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, and DOES 1- 50, Re: Dkt. No. 47 11 Defendants.

13 Defendant’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint was scheduled for a hearing on 14 September 8, 2023. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court VACATED the hearing. For the 15 reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to the extent defendants contend that the 16 claims of the decedent’s parents are time-barred, and GRANTS the motion to dismiss the Monell 17 claim, without prejudice to that claim being reasserted if discovery supports such a claim.

I. Statute of Limitations

20 The County contends that the claims of Carrie James and Perry Williams regarding their 21 son’s death are time-barred because their son died on September 23, 2020, and this lawsuit was not 22 filed until October 10,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.