Bayer

Bayer v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20233:22-cv-07440California2,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY BAYER, Case No. 22-cv-07440-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN AMEND

FRANCISCO,

Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is the City and County of San Francisco’s motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Jeffrey Bayer’s first amended complaint. ECF 26. Bayer opposes the motion, which is suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the motion WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, for the reasons set forth below. I. BACKGROUND On July 1, 2022, Bayer commenced this action in San Francisco Superior Court, asserting a Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and a state law claim for negligence. ECF 1-1. The City removed the case to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.