Brown

Brown v. Schuyler

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20234:20-cv-03405California1,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY L. BROWN,

Case No. 20-cv-03405-YGR (PR) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT v.

TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE CHARLES SCHUYLER, Acting Warden,1 GRANTED Respondent.

I. BACKGROUND Petitioner Gregory L. Brown filed the instant pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 3, 2020, the Court dismissed the petition because it was a second petition, successive to his previous case, Case No. C 98-02013 MMC (PR), and he had not obtained from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals an order authorizing the district court to consider the petition. Petitioner appealed the Court’s dismissal of his petition. The Court initially denied a certificate of appealability. However, upon review, the Court later found that petitioner was not challenging the same conviction and sentence, and instead his claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.