Piedra Gomez v. Extreme Exteriors, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20233:23-cv-00439California965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GERONIMO PIEDRA GOMEZ, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00439-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR

PLAINTIFF GOMEZ

EXTREME EXTERIORS, INC., et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 James Dore (Counsel) seeks leave to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Geronimo Piedra Gomez. (Dkt. No. 27 at 1.) Plaintiff Gomez has not responded to Counsel’s motion, and the time for him to do so has expired. After carefully considering Counsel’s motion, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS the motion as explained below. DISCUSSION Counsel seeks to withdraw from representation of Plaintiff Gomez because Counsel and his firm have been unable to communicate with Plaintiff Gomez regarding the matter despite repeated attempts via phone, text, and email. (Dkt. No. 27 ¶ 2.) In the Northern District of California, “[c]ounsel may not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.