Marani
Marani v. Cramer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 KEVIN MARANI, Case No.: 19-CV-5538 YGR
ORDER PROVIDING RAND NOTICE TO PRO SE
Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS REGARDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR OPPOSING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. Re: Dkt. No. 139
MICHAEL CRAMER, ET AL.,
14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Kevin Marani has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment as to defendants Michael Cramer, Florence Cramer, Mark Cramer, and Scott Cramer. Ninth Circuit authority indicates that self-represented parties should be given “notice of what is required of them in order to oppose” summary judgment motions at the time of filing of the motions. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998); Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935, 940-41 (9th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the Court provides the following notice to the unrepresented defendants named in plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment: 23 Plaintiff is making a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which, if granted, will end your case by granting judgment in…