Crittenden v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANDRUW CRITTENDEN, et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-04322-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

v.

APPLE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendant.

Plaintiffs Andruw Crittenden, Dana Cooper, Deborah Valcourt, Jennifer Herbert, Gloria 14 King, Cortney Schneider, Antonio Holland, Jessie Santiago, Brianna Pasquale, Patricia Simon, 15 Monica Charles, Steve Wayne Watson, Michael Moore, Brandi Leon, and Maria Oneal 16 (collectively “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, bring claims 17 for injunctive and monetary relief for harm arising out of various iPhone software updates. See 18 Second Am. Class Action Compl. (“SAC”), ECF No. 54. Defendant, Apple, Inc., (“Apple”) 19 moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a 20 claim to relief. See Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot. Dismiss”), ECF No. 55. Plaintiffs filed an 21 opposition, to which Defendant…