Seti

Seti v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20233:22-cv-01089California4,516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 TA SETI, Case No. 22-cv-01089-JSC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; STAYING

v. AND REFERRING CASE TO PRO SE

MEDIATION PROGRAM

JIM ROBERTSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without representation by a lawyer, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Jim Robertson, the Warden for Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), and Kathleen Allison, the Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff alleges eight violations of his constitutional rights. United States Magistrate Judge Hixson found the complaint, when liberally construed, stated cognizable claims for relief under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendants declined to proceed before a magistrate judge, and this action was reassigned to the undersigned. Defendants’ motion for partial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.