Rosa
Rosa v. Brightline, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 No. C 23-02132 WHA In re No. C 23-02291 WHA No. C 23-02503 WHA DATA BREACH SECURITY No. C 23-02909 WHA
LITIGATION AGAINST
BRIGHTLINE, INC. (Consolidated)
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR
APPOINTMENT AS INTERIM
CLASS COUNSEL
16 This putative class action currently consists of four consolidated actions regarding the same alleged data breach involving defendant Brightline, Inc., which is a telehealth provider focused on pediatric behavioral health. All four different plaintiffs’ counsel in those actions jointly moved for consolidation, and defendant did not oppose (Dkt. No. 25). A prior order found consolidation appropriate since there were overlapping issues of fact and law (Dkt. No. 26). Counsel in the consolidated action have now filed three different motions to be appointed interim class counsel under Rule 23(g). Defendant neither endorses nor opposes the motions. …