Tate

Tate v. Delgadillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20235:20-cv-09476California7,453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEREK TATE,

Case No. 20-cv-09476 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

D. DELGADILLO,

Defendant. (Docket No. 30)

13 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on an alleged attack by two inmates which was orchestrated by Defendant Correctional Officer D. Delgadillo, in retaliation for filing inmate appeals. Dkt. No. 1. The Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend for Plaintiff to attempt to correct deficiencies with respect to an equal protection claim; the claims against two inmates were dismissed. Dkt. No. 9 at 3-4. Plaintiff filed notice that he wished to proceed on the cognizable First and Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Delgadillo and strike all other claims from the complaint. Dkt. No. 13. Accordingly, the Court struck the non- cognizable claims and ordered service of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.