Coleman

Coleman v. Baumgartner

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20233:23-cv-01737California955 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WENDELL COLEMAN, Case No. 23-cv-01737-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

KENDRA BAUMGARTNER, et al.,

Defendants.

Pro se plaintiff Wendell Coleman commenced this action on April 11, 2023. ECF 1. He asserts claims for violations of 10 U.S.C. § 921, 18 U.S.C. § 35, § 241, § 242, § 1001, § 1621, and 25 C.F.R. § 11.404, in connection with child custody, domestic violence, and other familial disputes. Id. at 2. On August 21, 2023, the Court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF 32. Mr. Coleman filed a response to the order to show cause on September 14, 2023. ECF 48, 49. The response does not demonstrate that subject matter jurisdiction exists. As the Court explained in the order to show cause, there are two bases for subject matter jurisdiction in federal court: federal question jurisdiction and diversity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.