Tran

Tran v. Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20234:22-cv-02983California1,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THUY BICH TRAN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02983-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO FILE

v. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS UNDER

SEAL

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to seal. Dkt. No. 23. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). “[A] strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quotations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.